<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 2010-03-17 17:28, Jonas Sicking wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4BA191ED.70708@emsai.net" type="cite">
<pre>>><i> I'm wondering if data-* attributes should be renamed to priv-* to make
</i>>><i> it clearer that it's page's _private_ data.
</i>>><i>
</i>>><i> "data-" is such a nice generic prefix that I'm afraid sooner or later
</i>>><i> someone will start basing microformats-like markup on that.
</i>><i>
</i>><i> It's not a bad idea... Unfortunately data-* is already being used quite a
</i>><i> lot and has been widely advertised, so we have to be careful with this.
</i>><i> Anyone else have an opinion on this?
</i>
I don't feel strongly that either name is better. Though I would not
that priv- doesn't make things much clearer since it's totally
undefined who it's private to.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Maybe a better naming would have been: doc-*<br>
It's short, it kinda reflect what it's related to as well right? Or
does that clash with something?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Roger.<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Roger "Rescator" Hågensen.
Freelancer - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://EmSai.net/">http://EmSai.net/</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>