[whatwg] The truth about Nokias claims

[Shannon]

>>> Again, a false presumption.  This was discussed in the context of the 
>>> HTML WG at the W3C.  Those doors are not closed.
>>>       
>> Really? Does that mean I can claim a seat on the board? Where is this discussion about a public standard made public if 
>> not here? Please provide a link to these open discussions and I'll concede your point (and join - it is public, and free 
>> right?)
>>     
Ok so I found the other list (public-html at w3c.org). Nokia state their 
reasons and clearly it was discussed (at Cambridge apparently)  but why 
two lists for one standard?


Shannon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20071215/f00e936d/attachment-0001.htm>