[html5] r1482 - /

[whatwg at whatwg.org]

Author: ianh
Date: 2008-04-22 20:33:10 -0700 (Tue, 22 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1482

Modified:
   index
   source
Log:
[e] (0) Make the <dl> conformance criteria less redundant.

Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index	2008-04-23 03:27:45 UTC (rev 1481)
+++ index	2008-04-23 03:33:10 UTC (rev 1482)
@@ -10199,15 +10199,15 @@
    <code><a href="#dt">dt</a></code> and <code><a href="#dd">dd</a></code>,
    then those elements or <a href="#text-node" title="text node">text
    nodes</a> do not form part of any groups in that <code><a
-   href="#dl">dl</a></code>, and the document is non-conforming.
+   href="#dl">dl</a></code>.
 
   <p>If a <code><a href="#dl">dl</a></code> element contains only <code><a
    href="#dt">dt</a></code> elements, then it consists of one group with
-   names but no values, and the document is non-conforming.
+   names but no values.
 
   <p>If a <code><a href="#dl">dl</a></code> element contains only <code><a
    href="#dd">dd</a></code> elements, then it consists of one group with
-   values but no names, and the document is non-conforming.
+   values but no names.
 
   <p>If a <code><a href="#dl">dl</a></code> element starts with one or more
    <code><a href="#dd">dd</a></code> elements, then the first group has no
@@ -10217,7 +10217,8 @@
    <code><a href="#dt">dt</a></code> elements, then the last group has no
    associated value.
 
-  <p class=note>Such mistakes are often due to accidentally using <code><a
+  <p class=note>When a <code><a href="#dl">dl</a></code> element doesn't
+   match its content model, it is often due to accidentally using <code><a
    href="#dd">dd</a></code> elements in the place of <code><a
    href="#dt">dt</a></code> elements and vice versa. Conformance checkers can
    spot such mistakes and might be able to advise authors how to correctly

Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source	2008-04-23 03:27:45 UTC (rev 1481)
+++ source	2008-04-23 03:33:10 UTC (rev 1482)
@@ -8390,16 +8390,16 @@
   title="inter-element whitespace">whitespace</span> <span title="text
   node">text nodes</span>, or elements other than <code>dt</code> and
   <code>dd</code>, then those elements or <span title="text node">text
-  nodes</span> do not form part of any groups in that <code>dl</code>,
-  and the document is non-conforming.</p>
+  nodes</span> do not form part of any groups in that
+  <code>dl</code>.</p>
 
   <p>If a <code>dl</code> element contains only <code>dt</code>
-  elements, then it consists of one group with names but no values,
-  and the document is non-conforming.</p>
+  elements, then it consists of one group with names but no
+  values.</p>
 
   <p>If a <code>dl</code> element contains only <code>dd</code>
-  elements, then it consists of one group with values but no names,
-  and the document is non-conforming.</p>
+  elements, then it consists of one group with values but no
+  names.</p>
 
   <p>If a <code>dl</code> element starts with one or more
   <code>dd</code> elements, then the first group has no associated
@@ -8409,10 +8409,11 @@
   <code>dt</code> elements, then the last group has no associated
   value.</p>
 
-  <p class="note">Such mistakes are often due to accidentally using 
-  <code>dd</code> elements in the place of <code>dt</code> elements
-  and vice versa. Conformance checkers can spot such mistakes and
-  might be able to advise authors how to correctly use the markup.</p>
+  <p class="note">When a <code>dl</code> element doesn't match its
+  content model, it is often due to accidentally using <code>dd</code>
+  elements in the place of <code>dt</code> elements and vice
+  versa. Conformance checkers can spot such mistakes and might be able
+  to advise authors how to correctly use the markup.</p>
 
 
   <div class="example">