[html5] r2463 - [e] (0) Comment on the current violation of RFC2617. We may need to fix this at [...]

[whatwg at whatwg.org]

Author: ianh
Date: 2008-11-26 04:01:04 -0800 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008)
New Revision: 2463

Modified:
   index
   source
Log:
[e] (0) Comment on the current violation of RFC2617. We may need to fix this at some point.

Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index	2008-11-26 11:14:33 UTC (rev 2462)
+++ index	2008-11-26 12:01:04 UTC (rev 2463)
@@ -29220,6 +29220,9 @@
   agents to identify login forms on pages even when the user might not
   want to log in.</p>
 
+  <p class=note>The lack of a <code title=bnf-formauth-realm>realm</code> parameter in the challenge
+  is an intentional violation of RFC2617 (it isn't clear how the realm
+  concept would apply in this context).</p>
 
 
 

Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source	2008-11-26 11:14:33 UTC (rev 2462)
+++ source	2008-11-26 12:01:04 UTC (rev 2463)
@@ -33031,6 +33031,10 @@
   agents to identify login forms on pages even when the user might not
   want to log in.</p>
 
+  <p class="note">The lack of a <code
+  title="bnf-formauth-realm">realm</code> parameter in the challenge
+  is an intentional violation of RFC2617 (it isn't clear how the realm
+  concept would apply in this context).</p>