[whatwg] Suggested changes to Web Forms 2.0, 2004-07-01 working
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Aug 17 09:07:35 PDT 2004
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> So you wish to specifically exclude the plug-in approach, why do you
> wish to do this?
In the opinion of Mozilla and Opera:
| Any solution that cannot be used with the current high-market-share user
| agent without the need for binary plug-ins is highly unlikely to be
> In any case, whether plug-ins are relevant or not to the approach, it
> doesn't invalidate the point I was making. The argument against OBJECT
> so far relies on a particular DOM issue in a particular environment
> against an assumption of a particular style of script support, that
> should not be sufficient reason to reject it.
It is sufficient.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg