[whatwg] Re: DOCTYPE shouldn't be optional
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Aug 17 09:56:24 PDT 2004
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> Ian Hickson writes:
> > > .. and some of the DOM code, like whether anonymous elements exist
> > > in the DOM, iirc.
> > "Anonymous elements"?
> Possibly not the correct term. Isn't it accurate to say that in HTML, a
> TBODY element is only present in the DOM if it is actually present in
> the source, while in XHTML, a TBODY element is created in the DOM even
> if it isn't present in the source?
Other way around. The term is "implied elements", by the way. (That is,
the ones in HTML are implied; in XHTML they are just missing!)
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg