[whatwg] Seperation of Content and Interface

Lachlan Hunt lachlan.hunt at iinet.net.au
Thu Aug 19 07:42:47 PDT 2004

Jim Ley wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:09:20 +1000, Lachlan Hunt
> <lachlan.hunt at iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>3. giving the following error when served XHTML 1.1 as application/xml:
> GOOD! I absolutely do not believe a browser should attempt to render
> application/xml.

Why not?  It's been defined as an acceptable MIME type for XHTML, and 
is, along with text/xml, the only registered type for any generic XML 

> (it's also been fixed AIUI)

What exactly has been fixed?

>>They're just the ones I know about, I'm sure there would be many more.
>>IE certainly does not support XHTML; it doesn't even fully support
>>HTML4.  It has only ever supported tag soup.
> Indeed, it shows how much better a tag-soup renderer is than Mozilla
> in XHTML mode (Mozilla's tag-soup mode shows it to of course!)

What?  The fact that it doesn't support HTML or XHTML at all, is your 
reason for saying that it's better than a compliant XHTML UA‽  That 
makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.  Seriously, take a look at my site 
in IE, and then tell me you still think IE is better at rendering, 
compared with Mozilla and Opera!

Lachlan Hunt

lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au

More information about the whatwg mailing list