[whatwg] Accesskey in Web Forms 2
ian at hixie.ch
Sat Aug 28 08:01:20 PDT 2004
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Derek Featherstone wrote:
> I agree completely, Henri. I know we aren't talking about XHTML 2.0
> here, but I think the mechanism they've proposed in the latest working
> draft is much more useful and beneficial to the people that actually
> need to establish these keyboard shortcuts. Having said that, it is my
> understanding that HTML 5 (or whatever comes from this) will need to
> backwards compatible - is that correct?
Yes, that is correct.
> I've written a lot on accesskeys (not sure if you've seen some of these
> resources before, and I've only recently joined up on this list, so I'll
> point to them. My most recent on accesskeys is "The Future of
> Accesskeys" http://www.wats.ca/articles/thefutureofaccesskeys/66 Again
> -- as I indicated, I know we aren't talking about XHTML 2 here, but I
> really like their strategy. Is there anyway we might consider a scheme
> like similar to what they have proposed? Or would it take too many
> changes to user agents to be viable?
It's an interesting idea for documents, but I don't think it really helps
solve the problems for applications (which is WHATWG's main concern).
Say you're writing a game (www.voidwars.com, for instance). You want a
shortcut for "show minimap", a shortcut for "just to research screen", a
shortcut for "select next scout ship with no orders".
How would the access attribute help?
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg