[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Note Wording
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Dec 16 14:28:52 PST 2004
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Brad Fults wrote:
> In section 2.16  of the Web Forms 2.0 draft there is the following note:
> "Note: These names, and their exact semantics, differ from those of the
> equivalent attribute in XForms 1.0 (the replace attribute on the
> submission element). The equivalent of this specification's document is
> equivalent to the XForms all, and the equivalent of values is instance.
> The equivalent of the XForms none value is document with the server
> returning an HTTP 204 No Content return code."
> > "The equivalent of this specification's document is equivalent to the
> > XForms all..."
> This seems redundant and awkward. Instead one might consider something
> like, "The equivalent of document in this specification is all in
> XForms..." or something to that effect.
Good idea, thanks.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg