[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Note Wording

[Ian Hickson]

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Brad Fults wrote:
>
> In section 2.16 [1] of the Web Forms 2.0 draft there is the following note:
> 
> "Note: These names, and their exact semantics, differ from those of the 
> equivalent attribute in XForms 1.0 (the replace attribute on the 
> submission element). The equivalent of this specification's document is 
> equivalent to the XForms all, and the equivalent of values is instance. 
> The equivalent of the XForms none value is document with the server 
> returning an HTTP 204 No Content return code."
> 
> > "The equivalent of this specification's document is equivalent to the 
> > XForms all..."
>
> This seems redundant and awkward. Instead one might consider something 
> like, "The equivalent of document in this specification is all in 
> XForms..." or something to that effect.

Good idea, thanks.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'