Transition from Legacy to Native rendering - (was Re: [whatwg] repetition model)
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Jun 24 05:47:29 PDT 2004
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> Jim Ley wrote:
>>> 1) How likely is it that a UA that supports WebForms 2 but not DOM
>>> will emerge?
>> I think it's unlikely, but it's possible.
> No, it's not. WF2 incorporates by reference DOM2 HTML and DOM3 Core,
> among others. You can't implement a WF2 UA without support for them:
> "This specification includes by reference [...]"
>From the same section:
| Implementations that do not support scripting (or which have their
| scripting features disabled) are exempt from supporting the events and
| DOM interfaces mentioned in this specification. Other aspects of this
| specification that are defined in terms of an events model must still
| act as if events were supported.
That was actually added on the request of a UA implementor who, I believe,
is working on a script-less Web browser.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg