[whatwg] repetition model
avi at beta4.com
Fri Jun 25 14:05:36 PDT 2004
On Jun 25, 2004, at 1:51 PM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2004 at 11:01, Avi Bryant wrote:
>>> I do agree that the [id] stuff is somewhat dodgy. I really am at a
>>> loss of
>>> how to do a better solution, though. And it does work quite well.
>> In other words: it's a useful hack. No argument there, as long as we
>> agree that it would be nice to find something that *isn't* dodgy.
> This complexity seems to be introduced simply because one wants to
> choose where in a "name" or "id" value the index goes.
> To go with the "nested repetition" example in the spec there would be
> no way of telling whether
> <input name="planetmoon135"/>
> was the 35th moon of the 1st planet or the 5th moon of the 13th
Instead of simply appending the number, append a "." and then the
number. So you'd get
This follows the precedent set by <input type="image">. I think this
makes your indexposition attribute unnecessary.
I like it much, much better than the [id] expansion.
More information about the whatwg