[whatwg] unclear example
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Jun 30 12:56:04 PDT 2004
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Mark Schenk wrote:
> In section 2.1 an example is given of the newly introduced attributes,
> which has me confused a bit. It concerns the following lines: [...]
Oops. Those should all be in th elong format. Fixed.
(Although maybe we should allow the shorter format? I keep going back and
forth on this. Now that the format is defined in the spec, it would be
easier to allow trimming of seconds and milliseconds.)
> Or should I look for the answer in the line "All the numbers must be in
> base ten and zero-padded if necessary." so that the UA should take 8:00
> and add zeros to it to get the official format?
No, that's talking about the format, not the interpretation of the format.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg