[whatwg] [web-apps] Some comments
jim.ley at gmail.com
Fri Nov 12 05:34:44 PST 2004
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:47:59 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> > completely semantically empty unless you do it in the markup too.
> > an incorrect use of either does not disqualify that point.
> What gives you the idea that JS is optional?
Implementation experience, specification experience, accessibility
experience, there are plenty of sites on the web that rely on JS, but
equally there are plenty that rely on CSS.
More information about the whatwg