[whatwg] [web-apps] Some comments
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Nov 12 05:45:01 PST 2004
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:47:59 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> > > completely semantically empty unless you do it in the markup too.
> > > an incorrect use of either does not disqualify that point.
> > What gives you the idea that JS is optional?
> Implementation experience, specification experience, accessibility
> experience, there are plenty of sites on the web that rely on JS, but
> equally there are plenty that rely on CSS.
The difference is that relying on JS is legitimate, while relying on CSS
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg