[whatwg] refer to 'Web Applications 1.0' instead of 'Web Apps 1.0'
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Nov 16 17:04:51 PST 2004
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, dolphinling wrote:
> > >
> > > I guess 'Web Apps' was chosen because the title of the specification
> > > used to be longer (Web Application Markup Language or something
> > > similar), but no the specification is called 'Web Applications',
> > > similar to the names of the other specifications, 'Web Forms' and
> > > 'Web Controls' I think the name should be written full out when a
> > > reference is made.
> > Oops, yeah, that was a mistake. Let me know if you find any others.
> From Google:
> The front page (Anne mentioned this already)
> Two places on http://whatwg.org/charter
> Two places on http://whatwg.org/specs/web-controls/current-work/
> Once on http://whatwg.org/news/start
Fixed some of the above. Didn't change the news page since that's an
archive, and changing that seems revisionist.
> Other than that only the url http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/* , which
> I assume we want to keep.
Yeah, that seems fine.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg