[whatwg] Re: refer to 'Web Applications 1.0' instead of 'Web Apps 1.0'
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Sun Nov 21 17:43:32 PST 2004
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > I also think that we should change "user agents may provide access to
> > linked documents through a navigation bar" to 'should', since they are
> > only useful if UAs do something with it.
>
> Perhaps nitpicking, but I disagree with the recommendation that the
> linked documents should be presented through a navigation bar - that may
> be appropriate for graphical web browsers, but probably not for the text
> ones. I.e. in ELinks we just list the interesting <link>s at the
> document start, which is not the best solution, but much better than
> trying to stuff them into some kind of a toolbar.
>
> "User agents should provide some access to the linked documents, i.e.
> through a navigation bar." ...?
At the moment the spec doesn't mention what to do with <link> elements at
all. I think that's probably for the best, given that not everyone agrees
that they are worth showing in the first place.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list