[whatwg] Menus, fallback, and backwards compatibility: ideas wanted
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Dec 14 15:00:08 PST 2005
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Matthew Raymond wrote:
>
> First of all, my suggestion is that submenus always have an associated
> <menulabel>.
So what do you do when there isn't one?
FWIW, I propose that a menu with no title inside another menu just ends up
treated as if it had a separator each side. As in:
<menu ...>
<command/>
<menu>
<command/>
</menu>
<command/>
</menu>
...would be equivalent to:
<menu ...>
<command/>
<hr/>
<command/>
<hr/>
<command/>
</menu>
> | <menu type="menubar">
> | <li>
> | <menulabel for="menu1">Foo</menulabel>
> | <menu id="menu1" type="popup">
> | ...
> | </menu>
> | </li>
> | <li>
> | <a href="frobozz.html">Frobozz</a>
> | </li>
> | <li>
> | <menulabel for="menu2">Bar</menulabel>
> | <menu id="menu2" type="popup">
> | ...
> | </menu>
> | </li>
> | </menu>
Here's how I'm thinking that would look:
<menu type="commands">
<li>
<menu label="Foo">
...
</menu>
</li>
<li>
<a href="frobozz.html">Frobozz</a>
</li>
<li>
<menu label="Bar">
...
</menu>
</li>
</menu>
> With this model, you can even pull the menus out nesting altogether:
>
> | <menu type="menubar">
> | <li><menulabel for="menu1">Foo</menulabel></li>
> | <li><a href="frobozz.html">Frobozz</a></li>
> | <li><menulabel for="menu2">Bar</menulabel></li>
> | </menu>
> |
> | <menu id="menu1" type="popup">
> | ...
> | </menu>
> |
> | <menu id="menu2" type="popup">
> | ...
> | </menu>
Hmm.
There are several ways we can do this, though they all basically boil down
to doing the same as in your example -- having an element with an
attribute that refers to another <menu> element. The real question is
which element to use: one specifically for this, <menu>, <command>,
<label>, <a>, or something else?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list