[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Feb 3 05:36:54 PST 2005
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Daniel Brooks wrote:
> Ah, that makes sense. Perhaps a single sentance that states that they
> are counted as two form controls just like is described elsewhere (with
> a reference), but that they are otherwise skipped.
The spec says:
| For image controls, instead of using the name given by the name
| attribute, the field's name is checked against two names, the first
| being the value of the name attribute with the string .x appended to it,
| and the second being the same but with .y appended instead. Thus image
| controls are handled as if they were two controls.
| If the identified form control is a file upload control, a push button
| control, or an image control, then the field element is now skipped.
> Ah, it's in the third paragraph, but now that I read it again I see that
> it says 'from script', not 'form script', so I guess it's ok, but 'for a
> script' or 'for scripts' would be easier to read. The whole sentance is
> "There is no way from script to detect this situation because that would
> open the way for some privacy or security leaks."
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg