[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"
jg307 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Mar 23 04:51:02 PST 2005
Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel
>> strongly about this.
> Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known
> and used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if
> the type is actually IRI), go for URL.
I agree. URL is the only term that will be understood by the vast
majority of authors.
"But if science you say still sounds too deep,
Just do what Beaker does, just shrug and 'Meep!'"
-- Dr. Bunsen Honeydew & Beaker of Muppet Labs
More information about the whatwg