[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"

[James Graham]

Olav Junker Kjær wrote:

> Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>> Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel 
>> strongly about this.
>
>
> Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known 
> and used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if 
> the type is actually IRI), go for URL.
>
I agree. URL is the only term that will be understood by the vast 
majority of authors.

-- 
"But if science you say still sounds too deep,
Just do what Beaker does, just shrug and 'Meep!'"

-- Dr. Bunsen Honeydew & Beaker of Muppet Labs