[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"
dean at edwards.name
Wed Mar 23 05:15:10 PST 2005
I've never known this group to be in such agreement! Jim? ;-)
James Graham wrote:
> Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
>> Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel
>>> strongly about this.
>> Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known
>> and used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if
>> the type is actually IRI), go for URL.
> I agree. URL is the only term that will be understood by the vast
> majority of authors.
More information about the whatwg