[whatwg] [WF2] Objection to autocomplete Attribute
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Mar 23 10:05:02 PST 2005
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, [UTF-8] Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
>
> Therefore the spec has to *describe* and *allow* the currently
> implemented behavior, but does not have to *mandate* it.
>
> So the spec could describe the meaning of the autocomplete attribute and
> then, without any "should" or "must"'s describe the UI behavior that The
> Banks consider acceptable in a banking client. Then implementors are
> free to choose whether to make their browser Bank-compliant or fully
> user-empowering by default, independently from the decision to support
> WF2.
The exact UI behaviour is left open by the spec right now, it's just the
general behaviour that is defined. And now it's a should, anyway, so UAs
can, if they have a good reason to (like "it's very bad user hostile
UI!"), do something else.
Is that enough?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list