[whatwg] ContextAgnosticXmlHttpRequest: an informal RFC
frenchy at gmail.com
Sun Mar 27 17:31:30 PST 2005
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:09:41 +0100, Jim Ley <jim.ley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:12:03 -0800, Chris Holland <frenchy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But yeah, it also comes down to use cases and how badly we actually
> > would *need* cookie support. For any kind of heavily transactional
> > application that requires some sort of state persistence, we're more
> > likely to be hitting our own host.
> If we're hitting our own host, there's no use case for the
> cross-domain object at all.
yes. that was my point. we'd be using a regular old XmlHttpRequest
object which fully supports cookies.
More information about the whatwg