[whatwg] ContextAgnosticXmlHttpRequest: an informal RFC
jim.ley at gmail.com
Sun Mar 27 15:09:41 PST 2005
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:12:03 -0800, Chris Holland <frenchy at gmail.com> wrote:
> But yeah, it also comes down to use cases and how badly we actually
> would *need* cookie support. For any kind of heavily transactional
> application that requires some sort of state persistence, we're more
> likely to be hitting our own host.
If we're hitting our own host, there's no use case for the
cross-domain object at all.
More information about the whatwg