[whatwg] some feedback on Web Apps 1.0 client-side storage
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Sep 8 15:31:03 PDT 2005
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
>
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> > > 3.4.2 "DOM Node objects" browser DOM nodes often have state that isn't
> > > apparent in the DOM --- e.g., the contents of a <canvas>, or the state of
> > > form controls. Please clarify that this state is not restored and ONLY the
> > > listed attributes and children may be restored.
> >
> > Added a note to this effect.
>
> Shouldn't the rules for this be identical to the rules for cloneNode in DOM 3?
DOM3 Core doesn't really define what cloneNode() does, so it is a poor
model to follow. Also, one of the things it _does_ define is something we
can't do, namely calling the NODE_CLONED UserDataHandler (because the two
nodes don't exist at the same time).
Is there something in the spec for Storage that you feel differs from the
way cloneNode() works?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list