[whatwg] Graceful Degradation and Mime Types [was: trailing slash]
karl at w3.org
Sun Dec 3 22:07:01 PST 2006
Le 4 déc. 2006 à 14:48, Mike Schinkel a écrit :
>>> Consequently these systems implement some sort of
>>> markdown format that's simpler and allows users to
>>> enter data in plain text or increasingly with a WYSIWYG
>>> editor. All that's needed is for these systems to generate
>>> valid markup, and we're done. Mot users don;t need to
>>> know any details of this.
> Not all use markdown, many allow HTML, especially blogs. And the
> more I've
> thought about it, the more I think markdown might be a bad idea
> (future blog
> post planned on that topic, once I've crystalized my full thoughts
> on the
Give the possibility that the "textarea" of a form to trigger an
editor, (A kind of setenv $EDITOR "editorname")(potentially wysiwyg).
and/or implement a real wysiwyg editor for forms in browsers (which
sounds a bit silly when you really think about it)
There will be less nightmare of hand code editing.
> P.S. If markdown IS the answer, I think the W3C needs to define a
> for such markdown. There are too many competiting implementations for
> userrs to learn today.
hundreds, each developers implementing a Wiki is starting with the
WikiWikiWeb syntax and then add stuff. If there is an abstract model
of "Web Documents", then the rest is just a question of
serialization. What Sam Ruby is doing in fact in the discussion.
- textish format
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
More information about the whatwg