[whatwg] Content Model Restrictions on table>tr in HTML
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Dec 6 09:19:54 PST 2006
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
> From: Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch>
> > > A missing </option> implies non-conformance but no parse error per 9.1
> > > and 9.2 respectively.
> > <option> and other form controls aren't yet really part of the
> > specification, and are missing all over the place. I added these to the
> > syntax section for you, [...]
> FWIW... </option> may also be omitted if the next sibling is an optgroup
Hm. Actually an <optgroup> start tag has to imply an </optgroup> end tag
for compatibility with browsers... spec fixed.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg