[whatwg] Spellchecking proposal #2
Alexey Feldgendler
alexey at feldgendler.ru
Fri Jun 23 22:13:21 PDT 2006
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:09:41 +0700, Lachlan Hunt
<lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote:
>> IMHO we should not rely on unspecified heuristics. In some browsers,
>> they work rather well, in some they might constantly fail. Leave
>> heuristics for invalid pages, quirks mode etc -- or document these
>> heuristics.
> Generally, that's true. But since spell checking is only a user agent
> feature intended for the user (it doesn't affect the page or author in
> any way) and interoperability between one browser's heuristics and
> another is not required. Browsers should be allowed to innovate as much
> as they like so they can come up with the best method that suits their
> users.
Once again, a CSS/XBL based approach would be better here. Unless
something is specified explicitly, the user agent can implement any kind
of logic in its default rules.
--
Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru>
[ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
More information about the whatwg
mailing list