[whatwg] WA1: Conformance requirements
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Mar 10 12:04:59 PST 2006
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, L. David Baron wrote:
> Perhaps the way to fix it is to say:
> # Conformance requirements phrased as requirements on elements or markup
> # attributes are conformance requirements on documents.
> # Conformance requirements phrased as requirements on DOM attributes,
> # methods, or objects are conformance requirements on user agents.
I'm worried about getting it wrong. :-)
I've reworded the paragraph like this:
<p>Some conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on
elements, attributes, methods or objects. Such requirements fall
into two categories; those describing content model restrictions,
and those describing implementatino behaviour. The former category
of requirements are requirements on documents and authoring
tools. The second category are requirements on user agents.</p>
Is that ok?
I've also reorganised the conf section to make it read better.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg