[whatwg] noscript Content Model
lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au
Sun Nov 26 11:52:06 PST 2006
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> So, given that it already states the conforming content model is the
>> same as that of its parent element, I don't see how that is an
>> additional restriction at all.
I see. How about including that example in the spec and rephrasing
first additional requirement like this:
* Replacing each noscript element with its child elements must not
cause the document to become non-conforming.
More information about the whatwg