[whatwg] Where did the "rev" attribute go?
giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl
Thu Aug 9 10:33:29 PDT 2007
I assume that you have too much current work to remember what you have
written and why. You suggested that using class names as semantic
attributes requires some central authority to publish a specification of the
microformat in order that the robots are able to find out the meaning of the
class names used. I disagreed because I think the meaning can be inferred
from the names themselves.
And no, this is not a request for a change.
From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 1:23 AM
To: Křištof Želechovski
Cc: 'WHAT Working Group Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Where did the "rev" attribute go?
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Křištof Želechovski wrote:
> Automatic: class=A-N means A N. No spec needed.
> E.g.: class=red-herring means a red herring, and class=important-news
> some important news.
I don't understand this post; please let me know if it was requesting a
change to the spec (ideally by explaining what is wrong with the spec
that needs changing).
More information about the whatwg