[whatwg] HTML 5, OGG, competition, civil rights, and persons with disabilities
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
rudd-o at rudd-o.com
Tue Dec 11 16:20:14 PST 2007
> A decision was made to have the text reflect the facts that (a)
> no-one is happy with a 'should' and (b) that work is ongoing to find
> a solution (which might be Ogg, or something else). That's all.
I may not be a W3C chair, but I'm pretty sure that if I disagree, then
using "no-one" in your sentence is a lie. And I'm not the only one.
> >Listen to what the people are saying.
> Oh, I am listening. It's by no means clear that the Ogg crowd is at
> all. I'm also spending efforts working on finding a solution. I
> don't count lamenting "I want my ogg" on this list as spending
> efforts at all.
That's because you already found your solution: H.264. Except that it's not
an option. Face it, "spending efforts on finding a solution" is a red
herring, because if any codec was both good and patent-unencumbered (besides
the Ogg technology family, of course):
- you'd already heard about it
- you could still wave your hands and say "nooooooo, it might be torpedoed by
a submarine patent"
It's just stalling.
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o at rudd-o.com>
Rudd-O.com - http://rudd-o.com/
GPG key ID 0xC8D28B92 at http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
It usually takes more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech.
-- Mark Twain
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the whatwg