[whatwg] The truth about Nokias claims
shannon at arc.net.au
Fri Dec 14 11:39:17 PST 2007
>>> Again, a false presumption. This was discussed in the context of the
>>> HTML WG at the W3C. Those doors are not closed.
>> Really? Does that mean I can claim a seat on the board? Where is this discussion about a public standard made public if
>> not here? Please provide a link to these open discussions and I'll concede your point (and join - it is public, and free
Ok so I found the other list (public-html at w3c.org). Nokia state their
reasons and clearly it was discussed (at Cambridge apparently) but why
two lists for one standard?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the whatwg