jworent at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 11 15:03:40 PST 2007
--- Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi> wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2007, at 19:46, Jonathan Worent wrote:
> > There are plenty of elements in the spec right
> > now that aren't likely to be used often, but they're still in the
> > spec because they have merit.
> Actually, there are elements that don't have much merit (e.g.
> <samp>), but trying to pretend that they don't exist and aren't
> interoperably presented isn't worth the trouble.
What I was trying to say is that it will be impossible to predict an elements usage. Using that as
a gauge to determine if something will or won't be added to the spec isn't a fair argument.
> Henri Sivonen
> hsivonen at iki.fi
Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started!
More information about the whatwg