[whatwg] <video> element proposal
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
Thu Mar 1 03:59:17 PST 2007
On Mar 1, 2007, at 08:26, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> The browser could send along the list of supported MIME types in
> it's accept header for video formats, like:
>
> Accept: application/ogg, video/mpeg, video/mp4, application/mp4,
> video/quicktime, */*;q=0.1
Content negotiation is like a box of chocolates. You never know what
you are going to GET. :-)
The problem in this case is that the media types map roughly to the
container formats. However, the codecs are what really count. For
example, MPEG-4 Simple Profile, MPEG-4 Advanced Simple Profile and H.
264 all live in the video/mp4 container. However, support for these
codecs and their zillion subprofiles varies. (Yet another example why
optional profiles in spec are bad for interop. The profiling of the
MPEG-4 video stuff is worse than any Web spec "Mobile Profile".)
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
More information about the whatwg
mailing list