[whatwg] toDataURL() and unsupported formats
Charles Iliya Krempeaux
supercanadian at gmail.com
Tue May 8 13:34:51 PDT 2007
On 5/8/07, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 May 2006, Aankhen wrote:
> > On a perhaps related note, is there a reason for calling it toDataURL()
> > instead of toDataURI()?
> Basically for consistency with the rest of the platform (starting with
> CSS's url() form). I can't keep track of what URIs are called these days.
> First it was URLs, then URIs, then there were URNs and shortly after that
> the correct term was URLs again, then URL was obsolete altogether and URI
> was the right term; then we had IDN and IRIs, and more recently we've
> started having XRIs... Whatever. Authors don't need this. "URL" is fine.
I've hear "normal people" saying "URL" too. (It seems to have entered
But I've never heard a "normal person" saying any of the others -- saying
"URI", "URN", "IDN", "IRI", or "XRI".
> Whether the answer is yes or no, it might be a good idea to tweak that
> > section slightly to be more consistent, since it seems to use URI and
> > URL interchangably.
> Fixed, thanks.
> Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the whatwg