[whatwg] One document or two?
Nicholas Shanks
contact at nickshanks.com
Thu May 24 09:56:08 PDT 2007
Various people have expressed opinions in favour of either one spec
to rule them all, or two specs for different audiences. Is not the
simplest solution to have two views upon the same spec?
HTML 5, Full Version (User Agent Edition)
"<foo> is deprecated and should not be used, but you have to support
it anyway."
HTML 5, Abridged Version (Web Author Edition)
"<foo> is deprecated and should not be used."
You can even have them at the same URL, with a pair of radio buttons
to toggle between them (which just toggles display: none on a class
to hide the unnecessary info:
"<foo> is deprecated and should not be used<span class="full">,
but you have to support it anyway</span>.")
Since I anticipate 99% or more of people who will read the document
will be HTML authors finding out about the new spec, Abridged should
probably be the default view.
- Nicholas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070524/c28942e7/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2427 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070524/c28942e7/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the whatwg
mailing list