[whatwg] several messages about <cite>
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Apr 15 09:57:53 PDT 2008
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Shannon wrote:
> It's alternative because it attempts to actually "classify" something
> rather than generically label it. I agree that class should only do the
> first and I do this with my own code but most designers do not. As far
> as the web design world is concerned class serves no purpose except as a
> JS/CSS hook. If you give class="book" or class="movie" special meaning
> or behaviour then you run the risk of clashing with existing
> Right now the mainstream web is "misusing" class. If you suddenly make
> class meaningful then some sites are going to get stung and not
> necessarily at any fault of their own - since the intellectual
> distinctions between "labels" and "classes" is of no concern to somebody
> putting pretty borders on a page.
We're not talking about making class meaningful. I'm not sure I understand
what you are arguing against at this point.
The proposal is just that authors should use class="" to distinguish the
various ways they use <i> so that they can (e.g.) style them differently.
Where is the spec unclear? I should rewrite it to avoid any ambiguities.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg