[whatwg] MetaExtensions wiki page
phil127 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 05:30:42 PST 2008
Ian Hickson schrieb:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100, Philipp Serafin <phil127 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up
>>> I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page still
>>> lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved.
>>> The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page had been changed to
>>> "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate
>>> Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago.
>>> Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values really
>>> handled differently?
>> They should be identical, feel free to fix the page ;-)
> Actually in this instance it's the spec that will be fixed in due course.
Thanks for the info. Didn't know mere mortals could edit that section ;)
More information about the whatwg