[whatwg] Reverse ordered lists
Simon Pieters
simonp at opera.com
Wed Jan 23 06:58:11 PST 2008
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:03:42 +0100, Lachlan Hunt
<lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote:
> Simon Pieters wrote:
>> <ol start="100" reverse>
>> The lack of start='' would make the numbers update as the list is
>> filled with <li>s. This allows both for simplicitly for short lists and
>> correct incremental rendering for large lists.
>
> No, the lack of an explicit start attribute would make it start from the
> default value: 1. It would then count down from there:
>
> 1. A
> 0. B
> -1. C
> -2. D
Why? From an authoring perspective I would say that it's more useful to
have the last item be 1 by default.
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
More information about the whatwg
mailing list