[whatwg] HTML5 Feedback: Section 3.5.2 Focus
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Jun 3 04:21:52 PDT 2008
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Brad Fults wrote:
>
> A few things in Section 3.5.2:
>
> "There is always an element focused; in the absence of other elements
> being focused, the document's root element is it." [1]
>
> This sentence is awkwardly worded and as far as I can tell, "document's
> root element" is referenced but not defined anywhere. It might be better
> as something like:
>
> "There is always a single element with focus. If no other element in the
> document has focus, focus is given to the document's root element -- in
> this case the body element."
>
> That is assuming, of course, that the body element is indeed the element
> that is to receive focus when no other element is focused. I'm not
> thrilled with this wording either, but it is an incremental improvement
> in comprehensibility.
This section got rewritten recently and the above text is no longer there
in that form. Let me know if it's still broken in your opinion.
> "If no element specifically has focus, this must return the body
> element." [2]
>
> This sentence references "the body element" (with proper linking to its
> definition). Is the intention here to distinguish "the body element"
> from "the document's root element" mentioned in the previous quote? If
> so, it's not clear what the distinction is or why it is present. If not,
> these two sentences should use the same terminology.
Fixed as part of the earlier changes.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list