[whatwg] HTML5 Feedback: Section 3.5.3 Scrolling elements into view
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Jun 3 04:33:28 PDT 2008
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Brad Fults wrote:
> There are a couple of problems I have found in this section.
> "If it isn't possible to show the entire element in that way, or if the
> argument is omitted or is true, then the user agent must instead simply
> align the top of the element with the top of the viewport." 
> I have two issues with this text:
> 1. The word "simply" is rhetoric and doesn't seem reasonable or
> useful in the context of this part of the specification.
> 2. It may not be possible to align the top of the element with the top
> of the viewport without scrolling past the bottom of the document, so
> the "must" is unreasonable. This contingency should be mentioned
> (scrolling past the bottom of the document is not, as far as I know,
I don't understand what you mean. How can something in the document be
further down than the bottom of the document?
> Secondly, with respect to this section as a whole, I see no description
> of necessary behavior for horizontal scrolling. Surely this is an issue
> that must be addressed, as it would be decidedly deficient if
> scrollIntoView() only took vertical scrolling into account, leaving
> horizontally overflown content still outside of the viewport after the
> method's invocation.
Do UAs do any horizontal scrolling today? I've mentioned it, but I'm not
sure what to say really.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg