[whatwg] Web Documents off the Web (was Web Archives)
ian at hixie.ch
Tue May 13 03:05:11 PDT 2008
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Tyler Keating wrote:
> Imagine this: An HTML based document ZIP compressed into a single file could
> be uploaded as is to the server. Clicking on a link to the file would
> probably download, decompress and open the file in the browser seamlessly and,
> even better, right-clicking on the link instead and choosing "Download Linked
> File" would download the same nice small single file.**
MHTML with a gzip transfer encoding seems like it would do this pretty
nicely already, no?
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> A cross-browser web archive format sounds like a useful thing. However,
> I don't think it should be part of or even tied to the HTML spec. In
> principle, such an archive could contain any browser-viewable content as
> the root document. This could be HTML, XHTML, SVG, generic XML, plain
> text, a raster image, or any number of other things. So such an archive
> format is logically a separate layer and should be specced as such.
Indeed, this would belong in another specification.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Jon Barnett wrote:
> What place does HTML5 have in specifying one of these options as a
> standard archive format? Any? A non-normative section on archives?
I don't think we really need to say anything in the spec -- it's a
specification, not a position paper.
There was much discussion about this topic, but given that I think this is
out of scope for HTML5 (and nobody seems to particularly disagree), I
haven't responded. Let me know if I missed something that deserved a reply
despite the foregoing.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg