[whatwg] Old idea - can't find on issues list (or anywhere else)

[Ian Hickson]

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, dolphinling wrote:
>
> Back in 2004, I sent an email about mutually exclusive sections in 
> forms, which was responded to as "a good idea, put on hold until WF3". 
> <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2004-October/002285.html> 
> <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2004-November/002532.html>
> 
> I don't see this in the issues list or anywhere else on the site, and 
> while the comments at the end of WF2 mention some related ideas to 
> accomplish similar things, I don't see what I proposed.
> 
> So I just want to make sure it hasn't been lost in the years of work 
> that's gone on.

It's in the list of issues at the bottom of the spec, as:

 XXX * dolphinling suggests having a way to mark certain parts of a
       form as being dependent on another (mutually exclusive parts of
       a form)

HTH,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'