[whatwg] Google's use of FFmpeg in Chromium and Chrome

Peter Kasting pkasting at google.com
Sat Jun 6 15:03:59 PDT 2009

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, King InuYasha <ngompa13 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Mainly because ffmpeg has way more than H.264 and other MPEG4 profile
> codecs. FFmpeg has a lot more than MPEG4 and MPEG2 and having licenses just
> for those might not be enough.

Why are you assuming that the FFMPEG binaries with Google Chrome are
compiled with support for all possible codecs that the FFMPEG sources can be
compiled to support?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090606/68b15071/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the whatwg mailing list