[whatwg] Workers: What can be done in a worker after call to close()?

[Ian Hickson]

On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Dmitry Titov wrote:
>
> I think the only change to the spec here would be the removal of the 3rd
> line in the description of what close() does, so the ports are still
> functional, at least for posting from the worker: [...]

I'm fine with doing this.


> Not sure about onclose indeed...  Perhaps we can use some time to see if 
> developers will request something like this more explicitly, then we 
> could think about it more.

There's no onclose in the spec currently. It was removed to avoid exposing 
GC behaviour.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'