[whatwg] Workers: What can be done in a worker after call to close()?
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Apr 1 17:42:02 PDT 2010
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Dmitry Titov wrote:
> I think the only change to the spec here would be the removal of the 3rd
> line in the description of what close() does, so the ports are still
> functional, at least for posting from the worker: [...]
I'm fine with doing this.
> Not sure about onclose indeed... Perhaps we can use some time to see if
> developers will request something like this more explicitly, then we
> could think about it more.
There's no onclose in the spec currently. It was removed to avoid exposing
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg