philipj at opera.com
Fri Dec 3 03:58:02 PST 2010
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:56:33 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:
> On 12/2/10 2:31 PM, Daniel Veditz wrote:
>> On 12/1/10 7:29 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>> On 12/1/10 3:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>> I dunno about solid, but the obvious things you can do with
>>> that are dynamic. That said, in a sandbox the only things that
>>> are available as obvious sources of dynamism are |new Date| and
>>> |Math.random|. So achieving solidity might take some work. ;)
>> by running an in-page script to generate data: urls?
> None, except for the fact that the in-page script would have to find the
> right places to stick those data: URIs, which might be impossible. For
> example, if I load a cross-site stylesheet, and it wants to have a
> then I couldn't handle that via script from my page, because I can't
> touch the OM of that cross-site sheet.
It would be quite straight-forward to use a cross-site <script> instead,
one that generates the data: URL and then inserts a stylesheet. It also
has the benefit of making it clear to the including side that scripting is
needed for it to work.
(Realistically though, just generating the images once on the server-side
as a JPEG/PNG is a more likely solution.)
More information about the whatwg