[whatwg] img copyright attribute
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Jan 18 22:43:20 PST 2010
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, will surgent wrote:
>
> It would be nice if there was a copyright attribute for the HTML 5 img
> tag. This would make it easy for users and search engines to filter out
> images that can not be used for certain purposes.
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Jonny Barnes wrote:
>
> Or maybe a license attribute instead, that would include copyrighted
> work and stuff licensed under some CC or alternative.
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>
> This is one of the things microdata/RDFa are meant to do.
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/microdata.html#examples-4
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, will surgent wrote:
>
> Hmm I didn't know about that. Thanks!
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Dawid Czyzewski wrote:
>
> And why img only? this would also be good for audio and video.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, will surgent wrote:
>
> That sounds like good idea (about the audio and video elements being
> included as-well). I just thought of it because Google does not allow one to
> specify the copyright or license in an image search as far as I know. having
> a license attribute would make it intuitive for developers to add the
> license the same way title and alt attributes are specified.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, timeless wrote:
>
> external metadata on copyright is a disaster. it gets lost immediately.
>
> GIF and friends have supported embedding (c) into images for decades.
>
> As google is fully capable of caching images (and obviously does so), I
> question how adding a tag to html will solve a problem which is already
> solved by the native image formats themselves.
>
> For lack of a more useful reference about comment fields, i'll just
> point to one application which is aware of them (although at the time of
> the posting it only supported them for certain image types):
> http://www.group42.com/ts-wi04.htm
Based on the above comments, I haven't changed anything -- the work
vocabulary pretty much already addresses this use case in HTML, and
addressing it in other formats is a problem for another working group.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list