[whatwg] Comment about "6.11.8 Navigating to a fragment identifier"
David Bruant
bruant at enseirb-matmeca.fr
Sat Jan 9 22:26:49 PST 2010
Hi,
My comments refer to what is after the "the indicated part of the
document" definition
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/history.html#the-indicated-part-of-the-document)
- There is a reference to the RFC3023 that may require a link to the
reference section
- Step 4 of the algorithm begins with "If this step was not skipped". I
am probably kind of niggling here (and I am sorry if it is the case),
but, in my humble opinion, this beginning is not necessary.
- Step 6 : while there is not "the", I think that "indicated part of the
document" should be a link to the definition of "the indicated part of
the document".
David
More information about the whatwg
mailing list