[whatwg] Comment about "6.11.8 Navigating to a fragment identifier"
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Jan 26 17:49:12 PST 2010
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, David Bruant wrote:
> My comments refer to what is after the "the indicated part of the
> document" definition
> - There is a reference to the RFC3023 that may require a link to the
> reference section
> - Step 4 of the algorithm begins with "If this step was not skipped". I
> am probably kind of niggling here (and I am sorry if it is the case),
> but, in my humble opinion, this beginning is not necessary.
It's strictly unnecessary, but I want to be maximally unambiguous. (You'd
be surprised how often people want to read between the lines.)
> - Step 6 : while there is not "the", I think that "indicated part of the
> document" should be a link to the definition of "the indicated part of
> the document".
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg