[whatwg] Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec

Robert O'Callahan robert at ocallahan.org
Fri Jun 25 18:50:51 PDT 2010

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Mike Shaver <mike.shaver at gmail.com> wrote:

> That is not my recollection of what happened with offline, for what
> it's worth. Mozilla and Google had a relatively small set of
> deviations between approaches (ours developed on the whatwg list and
> Google's developed behind closed doors prior to the Gears
> announcement) and Ian specified an entirely different model, over the
> objections of both Mozilla and Google.

Who from Mozilla objected? I didn't object, because I thought Ian's approach
(manifests) was better than ours (JAR files). And I thought ours was quite
different from Gears' (which used manifests, IIRC).

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100626/85a810f7/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the whatwg mailing list